Freeze the brief first
Write the markets, languages, channels, business outcome, budget range, data sources and internal approver before reviewing proposals. Change weights before scoring, not after seeing a preferred vendor.
There is no universal best advertising agency in Asia. The defensible choice is the candidate whose documented market fit, account ownership, measurement plan, operating controls and commercial terms match the brief. This browser-only tool applies one transparent 100-point method to every candidate; it does not rank vendors.
The total organizes evidence; it does not certify quality or predict performance. Investigate every critical control below 3 before contracting.
Sum of each 0–5 score divided by 5 and multiplied by its stated weight; maximum 100.
Criteria with a non-empty evidence note; a note is not proof until independently checked.
Account ownership, measurement, policy/data and exit readiness require explicit follow-up.
A comparable record requires all twelve criteria to use the same scoring scale.
Keep claims, documents and decision rules reviewable.
Write the markets, languages, channels, business outcome, budget range, data sources and internal approver before reviewing proposals. Change weights before scoring, not after seeing a preferred vendor.
Ask for the named document, access model, demonstration or reference behind each claim. Give zero when usable evidence is absent and record why a higher score was awarded.
A high total must not hide weak account ownership, measurement, policy/data handling or exit readiness. Put remedies, owners and deadlines into the contract or pilot plan.
Repeat the scorecard separately for each candidate with the same reviewers. Check references with consent, validate account access and run a bounded pilot when the uncertainty warrants it.
The form has no submit endpoint. Scores, candidate names and evidence notes are not sent to or stored by ALEX-DIGITAL. Do not enter credentials or personal data.
Weights are a starting method, not an industry benchmark. Adjust the written brief before scoring, verify references independently and use a bounded pilot where suitable.
Compare advertising agencies in Bali, Indonesia and Asia with a free 100-point scorecard for evidence, ownership, measurement, fees and risk.
No. The score summarizes how one candidate fits one written brief using the selected evidence. It is not a market ranking, certification or prediction of campaign performance.
A 100-point total makes trade-offs visible and easy to compare. The weights are a transparent starting method, not an industry benchmark; change them before reviewing vendors if the brief requires it.
Useful evidence can include a live account walkthrough, role and ownership map, client-approved case with metric provenance, written fee schedule, reporting sample, policy process or consented reference.
The client should normally retain administrative visibility, billing clarity and continuity of data and assets. Partner access should be role-based, revocable and covered by a written handover process.
No. Calculation happens locally in the browser and the form has no submission endpoint or storage mechanism. Avoid entering passwords, personal data or confidential credentials.
No. A score cannot guarantee rankings, CPA, ROAS, revenue or other outcomes. Market demand, offer, competition, tracking, platform rules and client operations remain material variables.
Weights are a starting method, not an industry benchmark. Adjust the written brief before scoring, verify references independently and use a bounded pilot where suitable.
There is no universal best advertising agency in Asia. The defensible choice is the candidate whose documented market fit, account ownership, measurement plan, operating controls and commercial terms match the brief. This browser-only tool applies one transparent 100-point method to every candidate; it does not rank vendors.